Skip to main content
The problem

What happens when the audit doesn't come first.

ERP implementation failure is common when projects skip an independent audit. They routinely run over budget and late, because nobody looked at the business before picking the software. The fix isn't a bigger budget. It's doing the checking first, before any platform gets chosen. And where the answer turns out to be software I build, the same rule applies: scope in writing before anything is signed.

The pattern · same business, same platform

01 · The decision

Choosing an ERP

and who scopes it first

02 · The demo

Sold on its strengths

what it does well, moved past what it doesn't

03 · The contract

Scoped by the vendor

before anyone looked at the business

04 · Go-live

Workarounds begin

the gaps turn up on the floor

Vendor-scopedOver budget, late

and the platform takes the blame for a data problem

02 · The audit

The business first

every workflow followed before any software

03 · The data

Fixed first

supplier feeds matched, before anything moved

04 · The platform

Kept, and working

the one they had already paid for

Audit first · Hanicks154,518 matched

to a supplier automatically, out of 317,812 products brought in

decodedops.co.uk · DO-ART-967 · Rev 01
The brief · DO-ART-991

Brief first. Every demo scored against it, ours too.

decodedops.co.uk · DO-ART-991 · Rev 01
Case study 01 · real production numbers

The platform stayed. The layer around it changed.

Nobody ripped out an ERP here. The diagnostic came first, the data got fixed, and the platform they'd already paid for started working.

Before
  • The 317,812 products scattered across supplier feeds
  • No consistent SKU to match any of them against
  • No reliable stock picture for the warehouse or the website
  • A platform taking the blame for a data problem
After
  • 154,518 matched to a supplier automatically
  • 40 active suppliers feeding in, without anyone re-keying a row
  • 3,844 Amazon listings re-optimised ahead of a title-format deadline
  • The platform stayed. The layer around it changed.
Case study 02 · the same pattern

Different business, ahead of the decision rather than after it.

17

supplier feeds automated from feed to ERP

20–40

hours a week, projected saving

Same pattern, different business: the diagnostic work came ahead of their own ERP decision, rather than after an ERP implementation failure. That's the whole difference, and it's the cheapest part of the project.

Book a free discovery call.

An hour on what's actually going wrong. If you're mid-way through an implementation that's slipping, that's exactly the conversation to have now rather than after go-live.